%matplotlib inline
Comparison between grid search and successive halving¶
This example compares the parameter search performed by
:class:~sklearn.model_selection.HalvingGridSearchCV
and
:class:~sklearn.model_selection.GridSearchCV
.
from time import time
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
from sklearn.svm import SVC
from sklearn import datasets
from sklearn.model_selection import GridSearchCV
from sklearn.experimental import enable_halving_search_cv # noqa
from sklearn.model_selection import HalvingGridSearchCV
print(__doc__)
We first define the parameter space for an :class:~sklearn.svm.SVC
estimator, and compute the time required to train a
:class:~sklearn.model_selection.HalvingGridSearchCV
instance, as well as a
:class:~sklearn.model_selection.GridSearchCV
instance.
rng = np.random.RandomState(0)
X, y = datasets.make_classification(n_samples=1000, random_state=rng)
gammas = [1e-1, 1e-2, 1e-3, 1e-4, 1e-5, 1e-6, 1e-7]
Cs = [1, 10, 100, 1e3, 1e4, 1e5]
param_grid = {'gamma': gammas, 'C': Cs}
clf = SVC(random_state=rng)
tic = time()
gsh = HalvingGridSearchCV(estimator=clf, param_grid=param_grid, factor=2,
random_state=rng)
gsh.fit(X, y)
gsh_time = time() - tic
tic = time()
gs = GridSearchCV(estimator=clf, param_grid=param_grid)
gs.fit(X, y)
gs_time = time() - tic
We now plot heatmaps for both search estimators.
def make_heatmap(ax, gs, is_sh=False, make_cbar=False):
"""Helper to make a heatmap."""
results = pd.DataFrame.from_dict(gs.cv_results_)
results['params_str'] = results.params.apply(str)
if is_sh:
# SH dataframe: get mean_test_score values for the highest iter
scores_matrix = results.sort_values('iter').pivot_table(
index='param_gamma', columns='param_C',
values='mean_test_score', aggfunc='last'
)
else:
scores_matrix = results.pivot(index='param_gamma', columns='param_C',
values='mean_test_score')
im = ax.imshow(scores_matrix)
ax.set_xticks(np.arange(len(Cs)))
ax.set_xticklabels(['{:.0E}'.format(x) for x in Cs])
ax.set_xlabel('C', fontsize=15)
ax.set_yticks(np.arange(len(gammas)))
ax.set_yticklabels(['{:.0E}'.format(x) for x in gammas])
ax.set_ylabel('gamma', fontsize=15)
# Rotate the tick labels and set their alignment.
plt.setp(ax.get_xticklabels(), rotation=45, ha="right",
rotation_mode="anchor")
if is_sh:
iterations = results.pivot_table(index='param_gamma',
columns='param_C', values='iter',
aggfunc='max').values
for i in range(len(gammas)):
for j in range(len(Cs)):
ax.text(j, i, iterations[i, j],
ha="center", va="center", color="w", fontsize=20)
if make_cbar:
fig.subplots_adjust(right=0.8)
cbar_ax = fig.add_axes([0.85, 0.15, 0.05, 0.7])
fig.colorbar(im, cax=cbar_ax)
cbar_ax.set_ylabel('mean_test_score', rotation=-90, va="bottom",
fontsize=15)
fig, axes = plt.subplots(ncols=2, sharey=True)
ax1, ax2 = axes
make_heatmap(ax1, gsh, is_sh=True)
make_heatmap(ax2, gs, make_cbar=True)
ax1.set_title('Successive Halving\ntime = {:.3f}s'.format(gsh_time),
fontsize=15)
ax2.set_title('GridSearch\ntime = {:.3f}s'.format(gs_time), fontsize=15)
plt.show()
The heatmaps show the mean test score of the parameter combinations for an
:class:~sklearn.svm.SVC
instance. The
:class:~sklearn.model_selection.HalvingGridSearchCV
also shows the
iteration at which the combinations where last used. The combinations marked
as 0
were only evaluated at the first iteration, while the ones with
5
are the parameter combinations that are considered the best ones.
We can see that the :class:~sklearn.model_selection.HalvingGridSearchCV
class is able to find parameter combinations that are just as accurate as
:class:~sklearn.model_selection.GridSearchCV
, in much less time.